Andy Xie: What Form Should China Take for Financial Reforms?

Andy Xie, renowned Chinese economist, shared his insights for CaixinOnline on the type of financial reforms needed in China

andy xie

China’s financial reforms should improve capital allocation efficiency and long-term stability. Measures to improve liquidity are not real reforms. They merely cover up bad assets longer and increase the risk of a financial crisis down the road. Under a fixed monetary growth target, such measures decrease capital efficiency by allocating more money to supporting underperforming assets.

There are two fundamental flaws in the financial system: first, both borrowers and lenders are government entities; and second, the financial institutions are staffed by political appointees. Unless either or both change, financial reforms will just be propaganda or prolong the status quo under a different name.

Because the real economy is government-dominated, market terms for financial reforms are misleading. Breakthroughs in financial reforms are very difficult. The realistic goals in the short term are controlling monetary growth in line with the economic growth, which is the only effective way to manage aggregate financial risk, and limiting loans to local governments and state-owned enterprises (SOEs).

Instead of complaining about liquidity, one needs to question the necessity and sustainability of the model. Building a city may pay off if competitive businesses take root there. But most cities do not have such businesses and have no credible plan to attract or develop them. Debt-financed investment has become an end in itself, not the means to something else. I don’t see how the current investment could end up well. The sooner this model ends, the better the country’s future would be. Hence, instead of complaining about insufficient liquidity, most local governments need to rein in their spending and let the private sector take the lead in growing the economy. If this does not occur, then there is no need for the city to grow.

Andy’s take on interest rate:

Interest rate liberalization is touted as a major step forward in financial reforms. I suggest caution, especially regarding the deposit rate. The lending rate is more or less about dividing up the income between state-owned banks on the one side and local governments and SOEs on the other.

Detailed analysis can be found here

Dr Andy Xie 謝國忠 is Shanghai-based independent economist specialising in China and Asia. He is currently director of Rosetta Stone Advisors and of China Boqi Environmental Science and Technology.

Dr Xie is one of the few economists who has accurately predicted economic bubbles including the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and the more recent subprime meltdown in the United States. He joined Morgan Stanley in 1997 and was Managing Director and Head of the firm’s Asia/Pacific economics team until 2006. Prior to that he spent two years with Macquarie Bank in Singapore, where he was an associate director in corporate finance. He also spent five years as an economist with the World Bank.

Contact us today to engage Andy Xie to share his insights at your next conference.

Deprecated: Directive 'allow_url_include' is deprecated in Unknown on line 0