The Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement presents Asia with good, bad and ugly scenarios, says Dr Dan Steinbock.
In his commentary, he explains the benefits, costs and limitations of the TPP to the US, China and emerging Asia. He argues that the broader region is not choosing between China and US, but each and both. He also explains how China’s free trade efforts are surpassing the TPP and how the deal leaves Asia with three scenarios.
Dr Dan Steinbock is an internationally recognized expert of the multipolar world. He focuses on international business, international relations, investment and risk among the major advanced economies (G7) and large emerging economies (BRICS and beyond). Altogether, he monitors some 40 major world economies and a dozen strategic nations, including all major nations in Asia.
Dr Steinbock has advised international organizations, government agencies, financial institutions, multinational companies, SMEs and family enterprises, competitiveness institutes and NGOs. He serves on media advisory boards (Fortune, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, McKinsey, etc). He gives economic and policy briefs for trade associations, government agencies and international think-tanks, chambers of commerce and financial intermediaries across the world.
He cooperates with think-tanks, and leading universities in the US, EU, China and India, ASEAN, the Gulf, Americas and Africa. He divides his time between the U.S. (New York), Asia (Shanghai), ASEAN nations, and occasionally Europe. He has been interviewed for Global Trends 2030 by the U.S. National Intelligence Council.